|Newer page:||version 14||Last edited on Sunday, July 29, 2007 7:12:17 pm||by LawrenceDoliveiro|
|Older page:||version 13||Last edited on Sunday, July 29, 2007 7:09:47 pm||by LawrenceDoliveiro||Revert|
@@ -19,9 +19,9 @@
We do not anticipate offering software on Linux. Nobody pays for software on Linux.
%%% -- same event as above
We have prided ourselves on always being the cheapest guy on the block ... One issue we have now, a unique competitor, is Linux. We haven't figured out how to be lower priced than Linux.
-%%% -- ["Fusion" 2002 conference, Los Angeles | http://www.varbusiness.com/file/36355.html]
+%%% -- ["Fusion" 2002 conference, Los Angeles | http://www.varbusiness.com/file/36355.html]
The way the license is written, if you use any open-source software, you have to make the rest of your software open source. If the government wants to put something in the public domain, it should. Linux is not in the public domain. Linux is a cancer that attaches itself in an intellectual property sense to everything it touches.
%%% -- [June 2001 | http://web.archive.org/web/20010615205548/http://suntimes.com/output/tech/cst-fin-micro01.html]